I am a bit tired and kind of out of it so if this post is a bit more disorganized and erratic than usual that is why. This book follows a middle aged man, his friends, family and neighbors through a grid down (EMP) event. The setting is Texas and while they don’t get into exact dates it occurs in contemporary times. Now we will go on to the usual format for these things.
The Good: This book was quite entertaining. I read it over the course of a couple days and was quite drawn into it. The story line was interesting, the characters believable and the plot (except parts we will discuss later) was generally realistic. The characters in the book were not some super hero’s (at least for the most part) who had seemingly been training their whole lives for the Zombie Apocalypse but average folks with an average range of skills.
I also appreciate that a lot of the “action” was in and around vehicles. This is quite realistic as well, that is how Americans get around (and will unless there is no fuel) so it is worth thinking how you would fight out of a civilian vehicle (vs a HMMWV or MRAP or Bradley with a crew served weapon and armored frame). Food for thought.
I really liked that the author did not get sucked into it being a walking product advertisement for his favorite kit, firearms, etc. Especially in the area of firearms this was noticeable. Different characters had different preferences and aside from generic observations such as semi automatic rifles are better for defense than bolt and lever guns, .308’s are good at punching holes in stuff, etc there were no caliber/ weapons platform soap box moments. Also there was never a moment where only a whiz banger 72 with a XXXX optic, YYY bullets and numerous other specific accessories (all of which the main character happened to have, how lucky) fit the bill and perfectly carried the situation. That was a breath of fresh air from other survivalist fiction.
The book also had some good ideas about getting organization going among a group of people in a disaster situation. Nothing revolutionary or new parse but some of the incidents that happen would make for interesting “what would you do” vignettes or discussion questions. The old leadership trick of convincing people that what you want them to do is their own idea came up more than a couple times.
The Bad: Early on and even throughout the book it was awful hard to keep track of the characters. I think that they were a little too shallow in developing them or maybe they exposed too many too fast, I am not sure. At one point just into the book I thought there was some swinging action going on between the two sets of main characters then I realized I couldn’t keep track of them. Maybe the fact that I haven’t slept much lately made that worse. In any case I decided to stop trying as it wasn’t really significant any way and just went with it.
The Ugly: 3 things stuck out as downright ugly and I will go through them in the order they appeared in the book.
First the way things go down the main characters do the vast majority of their preparing after an EMP goes off and kills the grid. They were able to keep going to the grocery store, which was being restocked, for a prolonged period of time which allowed them to stock up on staple foods. Also they were able to acquire a wide variety of different things during this timeframe. How exactly that situation would develop could be debated but this seems idealistic. I suspect it is a way to show how they became prepared and it allowed the main characters to not be hard core survivalists (though they were tactically trained and hunters, with solid gun collections which is not totally unusual but still a bit convenient) but also not starve to death.
Furthermore going along with this they were able to pay cash for items which I suspect would become very valuable very quickly like seeds, ammo, fencing supplies, etc. Again it was necessary for the book to work but still awful convenient and potentially misleading. I don’t know that things would go all Mad Max overnight (at least outside of massive urban centers) but I lean towards a more restricted supply situation a la Jericho or maybe One Second After. To his credit the author did work in how it would have been a lot more convenient for them to get this stuff earlier a few times but this whole part was just unbelievable to me. I had to ignore it to continue reading and enjoying the book.
Second I think this book might have been edited by the ACLU and some sort of womens rights group prior to publication. The main characters paused regularly to discuss feminist views and worry about women’s rights. When they were making committees for different areas one woman demanded that a woman be put onto a committee based solely on gender. We will call this gal Quota Girl. Quota girl somehow ended up in charge of all kinds of stuff for her “organizational abilities” and to be honest it just made me sick. They were more concerned with her feelings than having things work well. Also Quota Girl did no actual work and was a huge pain in the butt to the men she supervised who actually did work.
Furthermore I the author clearly made an intentional effort to have a nice, positive character portrayed in a great light of every reasonable ethnicity you could think of. It was ridiculous. Even more disturbingly all bad people were either race neutral or white guys of rural backgrounds. I’m not saying us honkey’s aren’t capable of some bad things but shoving every evil deed in a book off onto us is a bit much.
Lastly there was a classic hypocrisy when it comes to other peoples stuff. Call it theft, spoils of war, whatever but the main characters talk about how they respect everyones right to property and chastise minor characters for considering to acquire anything but then take all sorts of stuff they happen to find. There was some minimal justification but it was a load of BS, the least authors could do is have their characters own up to and be honest about their actions. Even more ridiculous the main characters go to great lengths to vilify bad guys for their treatment of people and then use them as slaves. This was just nuts.
These criticisms aside I did enjoy the book and get some things out of it. Made me think a lot about my current priorities and shift some things around a bit. I would recommend it but would suggest you scheme to avoid paying full price.
14 comments:
my comments never get posted, any how --How about this very good read ''Neither Predator Nor Prey'' by Mark Spungin, Pres of Wyoming State Shooters Assoc. (www.WSSA.org ).
I recently read Lights Out as well. Actually the first book of the 'survival' genre (after Alas Babylon). I initially had reservations about the grocery shopping and other transactions, where the only nod to the situation was folks only wanting silver (or even just cash). I endded up with the opinion that the author was setting it up that most people had faith in what the government was saying and expected things to be back to normal 'soon'. I think that is very realistic, and I think the author did a good job of showing the fallacy of that mindset.
Overall I really enjoyed the book.
It's been awhile since I read that book (PDF format), but I thought it was ok, more realistic than Rawles' (though that was meant to show what it can be like to be uber prepared).
Some parts were a bit convenient, like the training they had, relative ease in getting more weapons, the grocery store, and a prepper boss paying forward so much silver.
I don't recall the slavery referenced.
Hey gents, you just got linked over at survivalblog.
Snoop-Diggity-DANG-Dawg
Your review made me want to see if I could find the original that was released free as I remember. It was titled lights out by HalFast. It would be a interesting exercise to see iff the PC edit you mentioned really happened. It may be since he published it for $$ it may not be readily available. The name HalFast is not very PC (HALFASSED)and is gone so you may be right on track for a PC edit fest.If I find I will report back ASAP
I agree about Quota Girl.
As I now remember, when I was reading it online, I kept thinking "Oh god, not her again." Every time she would get involved, my reaction was "why doesn't she get off her ass and do it..."
If she really wanted to help, she could have at least offered some male entertainment...
@ 2:05, I have heard of that one and will have to check it out some time.
@ WPC, As to the faith people have. I think some (most noteably the gunshop dealers as they tend to be paranoid) would realize what the paper was actually worth as soon as the EMP happened. You may be right about where he was going, I just don't see it playing out that way.
@ Suburban Survivalist, Yes a few parts were pretty darn convenient. The slavery thing was at the end after they captured those guys and decided "to make them work". In my book if you make people work at gunpoint that would be slavery.
Snoop, I saw that. Good times.
8:48, I can't say if somebody edited it against the authors will or not but it was definitely PCed out.
@ Jerry, Quota girl was pretty painful.
www.wyossa.com/ is correct if anyone wants to look at ''Neither Predator Nor Prey'' by Mark Spungin, Pres of Wyoming State Shooters Assoc. I am not the anonymous who put up the wrong address just a helpful shooter. looking at just the ad it looks like a good read with one preview chapter online
Re: Quota Girl (Susan in the online version IIRC) - She was annoying, but I did feel like the characters at least realized her annoyance and tried to calm things down in the story. Also, quota thing aside I think it was a good lesson about how in such a situation there will be people who aren't "bad guys" but who also won't just go along with consensus or be otherwise easy to deal with.
Re: slavery - The people they force to work were engaging them in a gun battle previously, right? I don't consider the response slavery so much as a POW camp under very harsh conditions. I thought the book made the point that it was either that or just execute them all.
I liked the book , it was a fun read . The good was when all families doubled and tripled up . The bad was the book looked down on farmers . Mark, the main dude did not want his daughter to marry the farm kid . Then the author had both the farmers die . Just who is going to feed their asses long term ? Hey Mark are you going to grow Happy Meals ? The ugly was the Kumbya talks between Gunny and Mark . I got three cavities from reading the book.
@ Sunrise089
Yes Susan was her name in the book. I think the part about bringing some inclusiveness and making people feel like part of the team was a factor. However the whole premise was totally ridiculous to me. Lets put her on the committee because she is a woman and deal with all her junk because she is on the committee so she can feel included. It would be one thing if she brought something legitimate to the table and was a pain or was just an annoying neighbor. Your mileage may varry but it bothered me.
As to the slavery thing. Yeah that is how it went. I considered the POW angle but since they were both random parties and one broke up immediately after the fight that doesn't wash with me. Not like they can say they are waiting to turn them over in a prisoner exchange or something. I am not saying there was an easy solution but they were not living up to their supposed ethics or values at all. Really it wasn't THAT different from the raiders who got into a gunfight and kept survivors to "work under harsh conditions" which they said was just so bad.
I would have felt a lot better about it if they hadn't jumped at the idea of those folks as free labor. The line between POW's (who under the Geneva conventions which nobody reads can only do certain things) and slaves for me was forcing them to work and the lack of an end to that condition.
Detaining them to figure out who is who and what to do with them I have no issues with, detaining them indefinitely and making them work is slavery. I would have felt a lot better if there had been some sort of conclusion inside of a short period of time to the whole thing. Maybe this was just an oversight and the author meant to put in a paragraph towards the end which wrapped that up.
Post a Comment